Landmark Cases
R v Dudley and Stephens
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
R v Dudley and Stephens, decided by the Queen's Bench Division of the English High Court in 1884, is the leading English authority that necessity is no defense to a charge of murder. The crew of the yacht Mignonette, adrift in a lifeboat after their ship sank, killed and ate the weakest member of their party, a seventeen year old cabin boy named Richard Parker, after roughly three weeks without food and eight days without water; the survivors were rescued and, on returning to England, prosecuted for murder rather than treated as having acted from unavoidable necessity, which was the custom among some sailors of the period. The court, in a specially constituted five judge panel led by Lord Chief Justice Coleridge, held that no necessity, however extreme, justifies the deliberate killing of an innocent person to preserve one's own life, rejecting the argument that Dudley and Stephens had simply chosen who would die when someone had to. Both men were convicted of murder and sentenced to death, though the sentence was commuted by the Crown to six months' imprisonment, an outcome widely read as the legal system stating an absolute principle while quietly tempering its human cost.
Facts
Decision Year HoldingHeld that necessity, including the necessity of survival, is not a defense to a charge of murder, and that deliberately killing an innocent person to preserve one's own life is murder regardless of the extremity of the circumstances. 1 Current StatusStanding precedent in English law and widely taught across common law jurisdictions as the leading case on necessity and murder. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Mens Rea, Doctrines R v Dudley and Stephens held that extreme necessity is no defense to an intentional killing, a foundational limit on excusing a culpable mental state that mens rea doctrine otherwise requires the prosecution to prove.
In Legal System
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.