Landmark Cases
Griswold v. Connecticut
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that a Connecticut statute criminalizing the use of contraceptives by married couples violated a constitutional right of marital privacy. Writing for the majority, Justice William O. Douglas found that specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights have penumbras, formed by emanations from those guarantees that help give them life and substance, and that a right of privacy sufficient to invalidate the statute could be found within those penumbras rather than in any single enumerated provision. The decision supplied the doctrinal foundation later relied upon and extended in Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972), Roe v. Wade (1973), Lawrence v. Texas (2003) and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015).
Facts
Decision Year Decision Date HoldingHeld that the Connecticut statute criminalizing the use of contraceptives by married couples violated a constitutional right of marital privacy located in the penumbras formed by emanations from specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights. 1 Current StatusFoundational and, for its core marital-privacy holding, undisturbed; relied upon and extended by Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972), Roe v. Wade (1973), Lawrence v. Texas (2003) and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) overturned Roe's own abortion holding while leaving Griswold nominally intact, though a concurrence questioned the same substantive-due-process reasoning underlying it. 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Roe v. Wade (1973) relied on and extended Griswold's privacy reasoning.
Decided By
In Legal System
Sources
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.